The Theories about 911 (Chapter 6 p.80 by Daniele Ganser)
It is important to stress that all of the theories about 911 are conspiracy theories. A conspiracy theory is a secret agreement between two or more persons to engage in a criminal act. Conspiracies are nothing unusual or new in the field of historical research. Al least since the assassination of Julius Ceaser in classical Rome more than 2,000 years ago, conspiracies have been the element of the political fight for influence and power. As 9/11 was a criminal act which was definitely not planned and carried out by one single person alone but by at least two or more persons who agreed on the plan before it was implemented, 911 must be classified as a conspiracy. Once we realize that none of the theories can be dismissed on the grounds that it is a "conspiracy theory," the real question becomes: Which conspiracy theory correctly describes the 9/11 conspiracy?
Friday, June 8, 2007
Monday, June 4, 2007
Quote from 911 and the American Empire
"I believe that no discovery of fact, however trivial, can be wholley useless to the race, and that no trumpeting of falsehood, however virtuous in intent, can be anything but vicious...I believe in complete freedom of thought and speech alike for the humblest man and the mightiest, and in utmost freedom of conduct that is consistent with living in an organized society. I believe in capacity of man to conquer his world, and find out what it is made of, and how it is run. I believe in the reality of progress.
But the whole thing may be put very simply. I believe it is better to tell the truth than to lie. I believe it is better to be free than a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant."
H.L. Mencken
H. L. Mencken, was a twentieth-century journalist, satirist, social critic, cynic, and freethinker, known as the "Sage of Baltimore." He is often regarded as one of the most influential American writers of the early 20th century.
But the whole thing may be put very simply. I believe it is better to tell the truth than to lie. I believe it is better to be free than a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant."
H.L. Mencken
H. L. Mencken, was a twentieth-century journalist, satirist, social critic, cynic, and freethinker, known as the "Sage of Baltimore." He is often regarded as one of the most influential American writers of the early 20th century.
Friday, June 1, 2007
Rosie O'Donnell versus Elisabeth Hasselbeck:
Who is right?
Rosie
I never watched The View. I had no idea why the media was making such a tadoo about the Donald vs. Rosie war, nor did I care. Until recently I couldn't stand either Donald Trump or Rosie O'Donnell. Why? Donald Trump is disgusting and annoying, his entire persona rubs me wrong and I'm entitled to feel that way. Rosie O'Donnell lost my respect back when she was on NBC pretending to be straight with a massive crush on Tom Cruise. It made me mad that Rosie was willing to insult my intelligence to appease NBC. Ever since I've avoided anything that her name was associated with, including The View.
It was quite by accident that I happened upon a clip of her being hassled by Hasselbeck for pointing out that if Americans wanted the truth, they better look past the monopolized American media, and that the truth was the government attacked itself as an excuse to wage wars on oil rich countries (not her exact words but the gust of what she said). It's my opinion that Rosie committed career suicide that day, and because of that she has gained back all my respect for the Tom Cruise caper.
Any American who would sacrifice what she sacrificed that day is a patriot in my book. Rosie may have a sharp tongue and a quick wit that a lot of people don't appreciate but she cares about each and everyone of us more than she cares about being on The View. She gave Americans two important facts that could save their lives that day; #1. 911 was an inside job. #2. The media is monopolized by a handful of CEO's who may or may not share the same goals which means you can't trust the news as a source for facts! Rosie has been asked to leave the View or she was forced to resign too by the way, her last appearance will be sometime in June.
It's my opinion that Elisabeth Hasselbeck represents one side of America. The side that refuses to believe the government would lie to, or kill its own people to dominate the globe. She is dangerous and so are the rest of her kind. Because burying our head in the sand will not save our asses. Rosie represents the other side that is appalled at the obviousness of the attacks and the governments involvement and she's willing to express her concern, fear and anger in hopes we can stop it from happening again.
Stumble It!
Rosie
I never watched The View. I had no idea why the media was making such a tadoo about the Donald vs. Rosie war, nor did I care. Until recently I couldn't stand either Donald Trump or Rosie O'Donnell. Why? Donald Trump is disgusting and annoying, his entire persona rubs me wrong and I'm entitled to feel that way. Rosie O'Donnell lost my respect back when she was on NBC pretending to be straight with a massive crush on Tom Cruise. It made me mad that Rosie was willing to insult my intelligence to appease NBC. Ever since I've avoided anything that her name was associated with, including The View.
It was quite by accident that I happened upon a clip of her being hassled by Hasselbeck for pointing out that if Americans wanted the truth, they better look past the monopolized American media, and that the truth was the government attacked itself as an excuse to wage wars on oil rich countries (not her exact words but the gust of what she said). It's my opinion that Rosie committed career suicide that day, and because of that she has gained back all my respect for the Tom Cruise caper.
Any American who would sacrifice what she sacrificed that day is a patriot in my book. Rosie may have a sharp tongue and a quick wit that a lot of people don't appreciate but she cares about each and everyone of us more than she cares about being on The View. She gave Americans two important facts that could save their lives that day; #1. 911 was an inside job. #2. The media is monopolized by a handful of CEO's who may or may not share the same goals which means you can't trust the news as a source for facts! Rosie has been asked to leave the View or she was forced to resign too by the way, her last appearance will be sometime in June.
It's my opinion that Elisabeth Hasselbeck represents one side of America. The side that refuses to believe the government would lie to, or kill its own people to dominate the globe. She is dangerous and so are the rest of her kind. Because burying our head in the sand will not save our asses. Rosie represents the other side that is appalled at the obviousness of the attacks and the governments involvement and she's willing to express her concern, fear and anger in hopes we can stop it from happening again.
Stumble It!
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The bias of mainstream media
by xxxxx xxxx
view all A A A Is the mainstream media biased? To answer this I looked up the definition of bias in Miriam Webster on-line: [a : BENT, TENDENCY b : an inclination of temperament or outlook; especially : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : PREJUDICE c : an instance of such prejudice d (1) : deviation of the expected value of a statistical estimate from the quantity it estimates (2) : systematic error introduced into sampling or testing by selecting or encouraging one outcome or answer over others]
Yes. The mainstream media is most definitely biased. For one thing every thing you listen to on the radio, watch on television or buy from the newsstand and read, no matter what the publication title is, no matter which of the 100+ channels it is on, or if its AM or FM, is owned by only one of six corporations (i.e.: (1) : deviation of the expected value of a statistical estimate from the quantity it estimates)
1. Advanced Publications Corp
2. Disney Corp
3. General Electric Corp
4. News Corp
5. Time Warner Corp
6. Viacom Corp
Some may think, six CEO's might not share the same agenda, that shouldn't cause bias in the media. True until you stop to think about the product they sale. Information. What information is the most sought after by consumers? Current events. Who has access to the most up to the minute information on current events? The government. Rather its the local police, courts, the State Capitol, or Congress, the White House or the Pentagon, all belong to one entity the U.S. Government.
An example of media bias orchestrated by its main supplier of information would be the recent shooting that occurred in Virginia; since the man who killed over 30 people at Virginia Tech, I have had to stomach listening to Katy Couric on CBS report on the need for more security and more gun control on our campus' all week long. Does Katy Couric want gun control and more cops on our campus' I don't think she gives a damn. I doubt even her bosses care about gun control or more cops on our campus' but I can guess who does want both; our government.
Prior to this horrible event there was a similar campus shooting spree that took place in the same state at Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, VA. What made that incident newsworthy was that the shooter was subdued by several students who themselves were carrying guns. Most newspapers instead of reporting the fact that the rescuers had guns used the incident to editorialize their opposition to handguns and the need for more gun control.
Many would blame the above example on "the liberal media". Many people also assume that the government is required to talk to the press and give interviews. No. The government is not required to give press conferences. They are required to share information with the public through the FOIA. However, the up to the minute information that the media supplies its consumers with, can only be had by playing nice to the government. They don't have the right to talk to Tony Snow, that's a privilege. The liberal media bias we hear so much about is the "one hand washes the other" that goes on between the government and the media. Or you could say the government and the media have each other by the balls.
view all A A A Is the mainstream media biased? To answer this I looked up the definition of bias in Miriam Webster on-line: [a : BENT, TENDENCY b : an inclination of temperament or outlook; especially : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : PREJUDICE c : an instance of such prejudice d (1) : deviation of the expected value of a statistical estimate from the quantity it estimates (2) : systematic error introduced into sampling or testing by selecting or encouraging one outcome or answer over others]
Yes. The mainstream media is most definitely biased. For one thing every thing you listen to on the radio, watch on television or buy from the newsstand and read, no matter what the publication title is, no matter which of the 100+ channels it is on, or if its AM or FM, is owned by only one of six corporations (i.e.: (1) : deviation of the expected value of a statistical estimate from the quantity it estimates)
1. Advanced Publications Corp
2. Disney Corp
3. General Electric Corp
4. News Corp
5. Time Warner Corp
6. Viacom Corp
Some may think, six CEO's might not share the same agenda, that shouldn't cause bias in the media. True until you stop to think about the product they sale. Information. What information is the most sought after by consumers? Current events. Who has access to the most up to the minute information on current events? The government. Rather its the local police, courts, the State Capitol, or Congress, the White House or the Pentagon, all belong to one entity the U.S. Government.
An example of media bias orchestrated by its main supplier of information would be the recent shooting that occurred in Virginia; since the man who killed over 30 people at Virginia Tech, I have had to stomach listening to Katy Couric on CBS report on the need for more security and more gun control on our campus' all week long. Does Katy Couric want gun control and more cops on our campus' I don't think she gives a damn. I doubt even her bosses care about gun control or more cops on our campus' but I can guess who does want both; our government.
Prior to this horrible event there was a similar campus shooting spree that took place in the same state at Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, VA. What made that incident newsworthy was that the shooter was subdued by several students who themselves were carrying guns. Most newspapers instead of reporting the fact that the rescuers had guns used the incident to editorialize their opposition to handguns and the need for more gun control.
Many would blame the above example on "the liberal media". Many people also assume that the government is required to talk to the press and give interviews. No. The government is not required to give press conferences. They are required to share information with the public through the FOIA. However, the up to the minute information that the media supplies its consumers with, can only be had by playing nice to the government. They don't have the right to talk to Tony Snow, that's a privilege. The liberal media bias we hear so much about is the "one hand washes the other" that goes on between the government and the media. Or you could say the government and the media have each other by the balls.
9/11 and the towers
by xxxxx xxx
view all A A A There are two conspiracy theories regarding September 11 and the twin towers. Americans believe one or the other. One side who believe the Fox News conspiracy theory that terrorists who were religious extremists crashed planes into the towers causing the two that were hit two fall within minutes of each other in the same fashion; and when they are asked about building 7 they believe that heat from the fires that caused the structural failure of the two fallen towers located across the street caused this 50 story bldg to fall into its own footprint as well.
Then there's the other conspiracy theory which is that the attacks were an inside job, carried out by those in power in our own government.
It really doesn't matter which side is right or wrong because neither side will ever know. Regardless of who was responsible for committing mass murder that morning, the incident itself was a crime. It should have been treated as a crime scene and the evidence should have been collected and preserved like it is in any other murder or crime scene. Had it been, there would be no need for theory's because the evidence would prove who the guilty party was.
America will never have its day in court, justice will never be served to the guilty parties because it is impossible to prove a case when the evidence was immediately destroyed.
For those of us who just can't give Osama bin Laden and a bunch of his religious fanatical friends the kind of power the Fox Conspiracy theorists are so willing to give them; no NIST report based on theories of what the buildings could or could not withstand, or a report that gives FEMA's theory, or the opinions of a bunch old guys who call themselves a 911 Commission Members is going to suffice. EVER. First of all, this would be like those of us who believe the government was behind the attacks asking terrorists like Bin Laden to give their expert opinion and present it to those who think it was Al Qaeda that killed 3,000 people as proof that it wasn't. NIST, FEMA, DHS, DOD, are not credible to anyone who believes that the U.S. government attacked itself, to go to war anywhere it pleased for the next 10 to 100 years.
Regardless of what you believe happened that day or what I believe happened NO ONE will ever know for sure unless a confession is made or a reliable witness presents tangible evidence to back up his or her testimony.
view all A A A There are two conspiracy theories regarding September 11 and the twin towers. Americans believe one or the other. One side who believe the Fox News conspiracy theory that terrorists who were religious extremists crashed planes into the towers causing the two that were hit two fall within minutes of each other in the same fashion; and when they are asked about building 7 they believe that heat from the fires that caused the structural failure of the two fallen towers located across the street caused this 50 story bldg to fall into its own footprint as well.
Then there's the other conspiracy theory which is that the attacks were an inside job, carried out by those in power in our own government.
It really doesn't matter which side is right or wrong because neither side will ever know. Regardless of who was responsible for committing mass murder that morning, the incident itself was a crime. It should have been treated as a crime scene and the evidence should have been collected and preserved like it is in any other murder or crime scene. Had it been, there would be no need for theory's because the evidence would prove who the guilty party was.
America will never have its day in court, justice will never be served to the guilty parties because it is impossible to prove a case when the evidence was immediately destroyed.
For those of us who just can't give Osama bin Laden and a bunch of his religious fanatical friends the kind of power the Fox Conspiracy theorists are so willing to give them; no NIST report based on theories of what the buildings could or could not withstand, or a report that gives FEMA's theory, or the opinions of a bunch old guys who call themselves a 911 Commission Members is going to suffice. EVER. First of all, this would be like those of us who believe the government was behind the attacks asking terrorists like Bin Laden to give their expert opinion and present it to those who think it was Al Qaeda that killed 3,000 people as proof that it wasn't. NIST, FEMA, DHS, DOD, are not credible to anyone who believes that the U.S. government attacked itself, to go to war anywhere it pleased for the next 10 to 100 years.
Regardless of what you believe happened that day or what I believe happened NO ONE will ever know for sure unless a confession is made or a reliable witness presents tangible evidence to back up his or her testimony.
Is Osama Bin Laden still alive?
by xxx xxxx
view all A A A Is Osama Bin Laden still alive? 27,000,000.00 says he's not.
Twenty five million dollars is a lot of money to most people. That is the reward for information leading to the capture of Usama Bin Laden according to the FBI's 10 Most Wanted website. If he is still alive it should be important to anyone who needs 25,000,000.00 and knows his whereabouts.
According to Usama's wanted poster which was posted June 1999 and REVISED in November 2001 (after the attacks on September 11th), "Usama bin Laden is WANTED in connection with the August 1998 bombing of the U.S. Embassies in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania,and Nairobi Kenya. In addition Bin Laden is a SUSPECT in other terrorist attacks throughout the world." There is no mention of the leader of Al Qaida being a wanted man for the September 11th attacks. So the writer who said it wouldn't matter because we may not have enough evidence to tie him to the 911 attacks was right; at least according to the crimes listed in the WANTED poster.
Another interesting and contradictory item on his WANTED poster is that the actual amount of the REWARD was raised to twenty seven million dollars, the Airline Pilots Association and Air Transport Association created a program in order to offer two million more dollars for information leading to the capture of this unique looking individual. It's contradictory because the Bin Ladens have won contract bids for the construction of International Airports throughout the Middle East. They were promised 335 million dollars in consideration of construction of the Yemen Intl Airport. This money was financed by the World Bank.
My personal response to this question is that Bin Laden may as well have died in 1999 after he committed his last KNOWN terrorist attacks according to the FBI.
view all A A A Is Osama Bin Laden still alive? 27,000,000.00 says he's not.
Twenty five million dollars is a lot of money to most people. That is the reward for information leading to the capture of Usama Bin Laden according to the FBI's 10 Most Wanted website. If he is still alive it should be important to anyone who needs 25,000,000.00 and knows his whereabouts.
According to Usama's wanted poster which was posted June 1999 and REVISED in November 2001 (after the attacks on September 11th), "Usama bin Laden is WANTED in connection with the August 1998 bombing of the U.S. Embassies in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania,and Nairobi Kenya. In addition Bin Laden is a SUSPECT in other terrorist attacks throughout the world." There is no mention of the leader of Al Qaida being a wanted man for the September 11th attacks. So the writer who said it wouldn't matter because we may not have enough evidence to tie him to the 911 attacks was right; at least according to the crimes listed in the WANTED poster.
Another interesting and contradictory item on his WANTED poster is that the actual amount of the REWARD was raised to twenty seven million dollars, the Airline Pilots Association and Air Transport Association created a program in order to offer two million more dollars for information leading to the capture of this unique looking individual. It's contradictory because the Bin Ladens have won contract bids for the construction of International Airports throughout the Middle East. They were promised 335 million dollars in consideration of construction of the Yemen Intl Airport. This money was financed by the World Bank.
My personal response to this question is that Bin Laden may as well have died in 1999 after he committed his last KNOWN terrorist attacks according to the FBI.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
