Saturday, June 9, 2007

Does the Press Pick Our Presidents-Helium

Yesby Julia WisdomPrint

Invite a writer™
view all
A A A The media definitely must be bought off by anyone who hopes to win the presidency. But, the way it works is more like the media picks a candidate that promises to uphold their special interests and donates to the candidates campaign. This was recently the case with Hillary Clinton. Rupert Murdoch probably most famously known as the owner of Fox News invested in Hillary Clinton, normally Ruppy puts his money on conservatives, so this should tell people that Hillary is not a liberal or a conservative to American politics, she's willing to see that the New World Order is put into play. Because Mr. Murdochs money is on Hillary, I'd bet a paycheck that she WILL be our next president. Rupert Murdoch owns more of everything that we are permitted to read, view, and listen to. He's huge, not that the other four CEO's who decide what we know aren't, but Rupert Murdoch owns the most.
Let's look at what George W. Bush's presidency has done for these media moguls. General Electric not only owns NBC and a number of sister companies but it is also a defense contractor. Think NBC was pro-Bush or covered up for the Bush administration on September 11th because they liked Bush the man? No. It's not that simple. General Electric the media was making sure that General Electric the Defense Contractor was going to be raking in the big bucks for all of them. Rupert Murdoch owns more media than he should because Bush bent the rules using Michael Powell (Colin Powell's kid) as the FCC head. Plus Rupert Murdoch belongs to pro-Israel lobby groups and Israel is very happy about Americas troops being in Iraq. And what CEO has his goals set on just national these days, its all about international. Globalization, big economy, ruling the world, Bush is a dream for any big corporation who wants to be tbe world leader of the product it supplies.
Plus the media is the government's mouthpiece. Hillary Clinton's campaign started in the late 90's with the Monica Lewinsky scandal. That wasn't to expose Clinton as a liar, it was to promote Hillary as a strong woman who could handle what most wives could not. It was also the tool the media used to divide the Clinton's into just Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton two separate and independent strong leaders who don't need each other but just happen to be married. Think about it, would you elect or even think about electing any other first lady? No. Because of who they are married too.
So, yes, the press, the media and the government are like an anaconda orgy and they do manipulate the public to get their way.